Dpp Seeks To Determine Interpretation Of Recklessness In The High Court

The Director of Public Prosecutions, Kerri Judd QC, has applied to the High Court for special leave to appeal against a Court of Appeal decision on the meaning of ‘recklessness’ for offences other than murder, in particular the offence of recklessly causing serious injury.
Last year, the DPP referred a point of law to the Court of Appeal to determine the correct interpretation of ‘recklessness’. In line with section 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the DPP can have a point of law determined by the Court of Appeal even though the determination does not affect the outcome of the trial.
On 2 July 2020, the Court of Appeal in DPP Reference No 1 of 2019 [2020] VSCA 181 held that the correct interpretation of the offence of recklessly causing serious injury is that an accused person had foresight of the probability of serious injury and proceeded nevertheless.
The DPP will be submitting that, consistent with High Court authority established in Aubrey v The Queen [2017] HCA 18, the correct interpretation of the offence of recklessly causing serious injury is that an accused person had foresight of the possibility of serious injury, rather than the probability of serious injury.

For further information contact:

Matthew Sadler

03 9603 2603

This tool contain translations powered by Google. All reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation, however, no automated translation is perfect nor is it intended to replace human translators. Any discrepancies or differences created in translating this content from English into another language are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance, enforcement, or any other purpose. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in these translations, please refer to the English version of the website.